Netafim Irrigation, Inc. v. Jain Irrigation, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20221:21-cv-00540California8,992 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 NETAFIM IRRIGATION, INC., CASE NO. 1:21-cv-00540-AWI-EPG

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

JAIN IRRIGATION, INC., JAIN

DISTRIBUTION HOLDINGS, INC.,

IRRIGATION DESIGN & (Doc. No. 34) CONSTRUCTION, LLC, and AGRI- VALLEY IRRIGATION, LLC,

Defendants

12 13 This case involves an alleged anticompetitive acquisition involving competitors in the micro-irrigation industry. Presently before the Court is Defendants Jain Irrigation, Inc., Jain Distribution Holdings, Inc., Irrigation Design & Construction, LLC, and Agri-Valley Irrigation, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Netafim Irrigation, Inc.’s First Amended Complaint. Doc. No. 34. The First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) asserts causes of action under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, Section 7 of the Clayton Act, and the Lanham Act. Doc. No. 25. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court will grant in part and deny in part…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.