O'Neel

O'Neel v. City of Folsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 15, 20222:21-cv-02403California6,837 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 FAUN O’NEEL, individually and as No. 2:21-cv-02403 WBS DB Guardian Ad Litem for her children B.T., A.O., D.O., and

A.T.,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 15 v. 16 CITY OF FOLSOM, a public entity; SPENSER HEICHLINGER, an individual; MELANIE CATANIO, an individual; LOU WRIGHT, an individual; [FNU] AUSTIN, an individual; [FNU] HUSAR, an individual, DOE CITY OF FOLSOM DEFENDANTS, individuals; COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a public entity; DOE DCFAS DEFENDANTS, individuals; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 24 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff Faun O’Neel, individually and on behalf of her children B.T., A.O., D.O., and A.T. (collectively, “plaintiffs”), brought this § 1983 action against the City of Folsom (the “City”); various Folsom police officers; the County of Sacramento; and various Sacramento Department of Child, Family and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.