Chapman
Chapman v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVIS CHAPMAN and JOHN No. 2:19-cv-00410-TLN-DMC CHURCHWELL, individually, on behalf of all other similarly situated, and as representatives of the State of California on behalf of all aggrieved employees, ORDER Plaintiff, v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a FedEx Home Delivery, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 This matter is before the Court on Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.’s (“FedEx” or “Defendant”) Motion to Add Contracted Service Providers (“CSPs”) as Necessary Parties. (ECF No. 34.) Plaintiffs Travis Chapman and John Churchwell (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 36.) Defendant submitted a reply. (ECF No. 44.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Add Contracted Service Providers as Necessary Parties. (ECF No. 34.) /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1 This case arises out of alleged wage and…