Covello

(HC) Aroz v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20222:21-cv-01934California403 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEX AROZ, No. 2:21-cv-01934-TLN-KJN Petitioner, v. ORDER PATRICK COVELLO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 27, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 16.) On January 21, 2022, Petitioner was re-served with a copy to his current address. Petitioner did not file objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.