Chandler v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitiation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20221:21-cv-01657California1,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANINE CHANDLER, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01657-JLT-HBK Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PROPOSED

INTERVENORS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE

v. TO FILE A SUR-REPLY RE PENDING

MOTION TO STRIKE

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND (Doc. 43) REHABILITATION, et al.,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Defendants. LEAVE TO LATE-FILE AN OPPOSITION

TO THE MOTION TO INTERVENE

17 (Doc. 44) 18 Plaintiffs, who are California inmates housed in a prison for women and a nonprofit organization that advocates for incarcerated women, allege in this lawsuit that two California statutes, California Penal Code Sections 2605 and 2606, added to the Penal Code by S.B. 132, an act titled “The Transgender Respect, Agency, and Dignity Act,” are facially unconstitutional under the federal and California constitutions and are also unconstitutional as applied to Plaintiffs. (See generally Doc. 1 (“Compl.”), 1-2, 34.) Several motions are pending before the 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.