Chandler v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitiation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANINE CHANDLER, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01657-JLT-HBK Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PROPOSED
INTERVENORS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE
v. TO FILE A SUR-REPLY RE PENDING
MOTION TO STRIKE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND (Doc. 43) REHABILITATION, et al.,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
Defendants. LEAVE TO LATE-FILE AN OPPOSITION
TO THE MOTION TO INTERVENE
17 (Doc. 44) 18 Plaintiffs, who are California inmates housed in a prison for women and a nonprofit organization that advocates for incarcerated women, allege in this lawsuit that two California statutes, California Penal Code Sections 2605 and 2606, added to the Penal Code by S.B. 132, an act titled “The Transgender Respect, Agency, and Dignity Act,” are facially unconstitutional under the federal and California constitutions and are also unconstitutional as applied to Plaintiffs. (See generally Doc. 1 (“Compl.”), 1-2, 34.) Several motions are pending before the 25 …