(PC) Totten v. Redding Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20222:22-cv-00810California2,620 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN A. TOTTEN, No. 2:22-cv-0810 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former county jail inmate, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On May 31, 2022, plaintiff was ordered to file a certified copy of his inmate trust account. (ECF No. 5.) On June 24, 2022, plaintiff filed a change of address to a private residence in Redding, and provided a copy of his inmate trust account statement. Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. As discussed below, plaintiff fails to state a cognizable civil rights claim, and this action is 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.