Lawrence

Lawrence v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20221:21-cv-01224California988 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT LAWRENCE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01224-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

v. DISMISED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER Defendants. (ECF No. 24) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

17 I. BACKGROUND On April 18, 2022, Timothy McFarlin of McFarlin LLP filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff Robert Lawrence (“Plaintiff”). Plaintiff was served with a copy of the motion but did not file an opposition or otherwise respond. 21 On June 10, 2022, the Court held a hearing on the motion to withdraw. (ECF No. 22.) 22 Plaintiff’s counsel Timothy McFarlin and Defendants’ counsel Michael Rapkine appeared 23 telephonically. (Id..) Plaintiff did not appear. On June 13, 2022, the Court entered an order 24 granting the motion to withdraw as counsel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.