(PC) Stevens v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20221:22-cv-00741California349 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LYRALISA LAVENA STEVENS, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00741-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. ) FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

S. SMITH, et al., ) (ECF No. 2) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Lyralisa Lavena Stevens is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on June 17, 2022, along with a motion for the Court to take judicial notice of self-authenticating documents. (ECF No. 2.) “A judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2) capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.” Fed. R. Evid. 201(b). Pursuant to Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.