Davidson

Davidson v. District Attorney of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20221:22-cv-00581California836 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TREVON FOREMAN and LOTISHA Case No. 1:22-cv-00581-DAD-BAK (SKO)

DAVIDSON,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF TREVON FOREMAN

Plaintiffs, BE DISMISSED FOR HIS FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH THE COURTS ORDERS

v. AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(Docs. 4, 6)

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF

BAKERSFIELD, 21-DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

17 _____________________________________/

19 Plaintiffs Trevon Foreman and Lotisha Davidson (“Plaintiffs”) are proceeding pro se in this action. Plaintiffs filed their complaint against Defendant District Attorney of Bakersfield on May 16, 2022. (Doc. 1.) On that same date, Plaintiff Foreman, a state prisoner, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) without prepayment of fees. (Doc. 2.) On May 20, 2022, the undersigned issued an order finding that Plaintiff Foreman failed to submit to the Court a certified copy of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.