Trate
(HC) Mosley v. Trate
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISAAC D. MOSLEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00797-HBK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
MOTION TO AMEND PETITION
v. (Doc. No. 4) B.M. TRATE, Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner Isaac D. Mosley, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on June 29, 2022. (Doc. No. 1). On July 5, 2022, Petitioner filed a “Motion for Permission to Supplement,” now pending before the Court. (Doc. No. 4). Petitioner seeks permission to supplement his Petition with “intervening case law authority.” (Id.) The Supreme Court has instructed the federal courts to liberally construe the “inartful pleading[s]” of pro se litigants. See Boag v. MacDougall, 454 U.S. 364, 365 (1982). Here, despite entitling the document at issue a motion to “supplement,” the Court construes the instant motion as a motion to amend his Petition. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure may be applied to habeas…