Korkor

(PC) Wane v. Korkor

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20221:22-cv-00813California531 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IBRAHIMA WANE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00813-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (ECF No. 10) KORKOR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Ibrahima Wane (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, filed July 22, 2022. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff requests appointment of counsel because he cannot afford counsel, the case involves complex issues, and Plaintiff has extremely limited access to the law library and limited knowledge of law. In addition, Plaintiff states that he demands a jury trial, the case will require documents, discovery, and depositions of witnesses, and Plaintiff has a limited education. (Id.) Plaintiff is informed that he does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.