Cisneros

(PC) Harris v. Cisneros

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20221:22-cv-00721California468 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN HARRIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-0721 JLT HBK Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

THERESA CISNEROS, FICHES, JOHN DOE, CHARLES RETTIG, STEVEN (Docs. 2, 9) MUNCHIN, and QUELITA S.

BOURGEOLE,

Defendants.

18 Marvin Harris initiated this action proceeding pro se by filing a civil rights complaint against Theresa Cisneros, Fiches, John Doe, Charles Rettig, Steven Munchin, and Quelita S. Bourgeole and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on June 14, 2022. (Docs. 1, 2.) The magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP be denied because Plaintiff has at least three cases dismissed that qualify as a strike under Ninth Circuit caselaw prior to filing his lawsuit on December 27, 2021. (Doc. 9 at 5-6.) Therefore, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff is subject to the three strikes bar under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.