Seibel

(PC) Hill v. Seibel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20222:21-cv-02382California914 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON HILL, No. 2:21-cv-2382 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KIMBERLY SEIBEL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se. Before the court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court will recommend the SAC be dismissed without leave to amend. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is housed at California State Prison, Sacramento (“CSP-Sac”). On screening plaintiff’s complaint and first amended complaint, this court was unable to discern any cognizable claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In dismissing those complaints with leave to amend, this court provided plaintiff with the standards for the constitutional claims he appeared to be attempting to make and with instructions for preparing an amended complaint. Plaintiff has now filed an SAC. //// //// …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.