Pfeiffer
(PC) Smith v. Pfeiffer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARMAAL SMITH, Case No. 1:19-cv-00437-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY
WITH COURT ORDERS1
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al.,
FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
Defendants. 16 17 This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review. As more fully set forth below, the undersigned recommends this case be dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and timely comply with the Court’s orders. I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND Plaintiff Smith, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se on his initial civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint’). Plaintiff’s Complaint, filed on April 5, 2019, is 82 pages, 534 paragraphs, and identifies 27 different defendants and 5 “John Does.” (See generally Doc. No. 1). The Complaint alleges 19 “causes of action” which…