Pfeiffer

(PC) Smith v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20221:19-cv-00437California1,637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARMAAL SMITH, Case No. 1:19-cv-00437-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY

WITH COURT ORDERS1

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al.,

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Defendants. 16 17 This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review. As more fully set forth below, the undersigned recommends this case be dismissed without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and timely comply with the Court’s orders. I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND Plaintiff Smith, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se on his initial civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint’). Plaintiff’s Complaint, filed on April 5, 2019, is 82 pages, 534 paragraphs, and identifies 27 different defendants and 5 “John Does.” (See generally Doc. No. 1). The Complaint alleges 19 “causes of action” which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.