Marlette

(PC) Dixon v. Marlette

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20222:22-cv-00930California280 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MITCHELL DIXON, JR., No. 2:22-CV-0930-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MARLETTE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 3, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to resolve the fee status for this case within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to resolve the fee status may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, Plaintiff has not complied. Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 14…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.