(SS) Jaime v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20221:21-cv-00307California396 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBEN J. JAIME, No. 1:21-cv-00307-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING THE PARTIES’

STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD OF

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER THE EQUAL

SECURITY, ACCESS TO JUSICE ACT

15 Defendant. (Doc. No. 28) 16 On March 2, 2021, plaintiff Ruben J. Jaime filed this action seeking review of a final decision of defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. No. 1.) On April 29, 2022, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. No. 25.) On July 21, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation with the court in which the parties agree that plaintiff shall be awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $6,599.36. (Doc. No. 28.) Good cause appearing, and pursuant to the parties’ July 21, 2022 stipulation, the court orders as follows: …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.