O'Neel

O'Neel v. City of Folsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20222:21-cv-02403California1,107 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo----

FAUN O’NEEL, individually and No. 2:21-cv-02403 WBS DB as Guardian Ad Litem for her children B.T., A.O., D.O., and A.T., 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 CITY OF FOLSOM, a public entity; SPENSER HEICHLINGER, an individual; MELANIE CATANIO, an individual; LOU WRIGHT, an individual; [FNU] AUSTIN, an individual; [FNU] HUSAR, an individual, DOE CITY OF FOLSOM DEFENDANTS, individuals; COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a public entity;

DOE DCFAS DEFENDANTS,

individuals; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 23 Defendants.

25 ----oo0oo---- 26 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for August 1, 2022, and makes the following findings and orders without needing to consult with the parties any further. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS All defendants have been served, and no further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown 8 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.