(SS) Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20221:20-cv-01686California437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROL E. ROBINSON, Case No. 1:20-cv-01686-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ JOINT

MOTION TO REMAND UNDER SENTENCE

v. FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING

FINAL DECISION AND REMANDING

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL CASE1

SECURITY,

(Doc. No. 23) Defendant. ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17 (Doc. No. 20). 18 Pending before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Remand filed July 20, 2022. (Doc. No. 23). Plaintiff Carol E. Robinson and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. See Melkonyan v. Sullian, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.