Santoro

(PC) Hardy v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20221:21-cv-00327California1,070 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KRISTIN HARDY, Case No. 1:21-cv-00327-DAD-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR ORDER OF CONTEMPT

OF COURT

R. MORENO, et al., (ECF No. 69) Defendants.

14 15 Kristin Hardy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 22, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for an order of contempt of court. (ECF No. 69). For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s unreasonable search and seizure claims against defendants Valencia, Moreno, Chavez, Dohs, and Ceballos, based on Plaintiff’s allegations that after Plaintiff was subjected to a full body scan, he was immediately subjected to an additional strip search without obvious justification. (ECF Nos. 22, 42, & 43). Defendant Ceballos has not appeared or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.