Haaland

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DON EPIGMENIO RAMIREZ., No. 2:19-CV-0845-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAVID BERNHARDT, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 48, for reconsideration of the Court’s January 22, 2020, order denying appointment of counsel. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), the Court may grant reconsideration of a final judgment and any order based on: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered within ten days of entry of judgment; and (3) fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct of an opposing party. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1)-(3). A motion for reconsideration on any of these grounds must be brought within one year of entry of judgment or the order being challenged. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c)(1). Under Rule 60(b),…