(PC)Allen

(PC)Allen v. Krantz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20221:22-cv-00621California1,452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN ALLEN, No. 1:22-cv-00621-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

R. KRANTZ, et al., PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 5, 6) 16 Plaintiff Kevin Allen is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a complaint on May 23, 2022 (Doc. No. 1) and an application to proceed in forma pauperis on May 31, 2022 (Doc. No. 5). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 2, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s applications to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that he be required to pay the $402.00 filing fee in full to proceed with this action because: (1) he is subject to the three…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.