McLeod

McLeod v. City of Redding

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 25, 20222:22-cv-00585California1,097 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo----

VERONICA MCLEOD, individually No. 2:22-cv-00585 WBD JDP and as successor in interest to decedent, DOLORES

HERNANDEZ; AMADO HERNANDEZ,

individually and as successor in interest to decedent, DOLORES HERNANDEZ; and YSIDRA REGALDO, individually, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v.

CITY OF REDDING; GARRETT

MAXWELL, an individual; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 20 Defendants.

22 ----oo0oo----

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER

24 After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the 25 court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference 26 scheduled for August 1, 2022, and makes the following findings 27 and orders without needing to consult with the parties any 28 further. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS All named defendants have been served, and no further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). II. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings, including the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.