Hogan

Hogan v. Central Loan Administration and Reporting

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20222:22-cv-00039California1,130 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 THOMAS M. HOGAN and RU HOGAN, No. 2:22-CV-00039 WBS AC Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

DEFENDANT CITIBANK’S MOTION

CENTRAL LOAN ADMINISTRATION dba TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND CENLAR FSB; CITIBANK, N.A.; and AMENDED COMPLAINT DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. 18 ----oo0oo---- Defendant Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) moves to dismiss (Docket No. 40) plaintiffs’ second amended complaint ((“SAC”) Docket No. 35) which alleges breach of contract against both defendants. I. Factual and Procedural Background The factual background of this case is described in detail in the court’s April 26, 2022 Order (Docket No. 32) granting Citibank’s motion to dismiss, and granting in part and denying in part Central Loan Administration dba Cenlar FSB’s (“Cenlar”) motions to dismiss and strike (Docket Nos. 16, 17, 19). In short, on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.