Savage

(PC) Arceo v. Savage

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20222:11-cv-02396California293 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY ARCEO, No. 2:11-cv-2396 MCE KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOCORRO SALINAS, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 8, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.