Haile

(PC) Dixson v. Haile

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20222:20-cv-00998California5,523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMETROIS T. DIXSON, No. 2:20-cv-00998-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND BETHLEHEM ASHEME HAILE, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s complaint alleging that defendants Haile and Singson-Ganitano were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. See ECF No. 7 (screening order). Currently pending before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 40. For the reasons explained in further detail below, the undersigned recommends granting defendants’ motion. I. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment In their motion for summary judgment, defendants Haile and Singson-Ganitano contend that the undisputed material facts demonstrate that they were not deliberately indifferent to 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.