Raymond

Raymond v. Compucom Systems, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20222:21-cv-02327California2,389 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 The California Labor and Workforce No. 2:21-cv-02327-KJM-KJN Development Agency, et al., ORDER B Plaintiffs, v: CompuCom Systems, Inc., Defendant. 17 In this action, plaintiff William Raymond asserts employment claims on his own behalf 19 and under the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Defendant CompuCom System, 20 Inc. (CompuCom) moves to compel arbitration of all of the claims except the claim asserted under the PAGA. For the reasons set forth below, the court holds the motion to compel 22 arbitration in abeyance. 23 I. BACKGROUND CompuCom employed Raymond as a Field Technician in 2010. Compl. ¥ 19, Not. Removal Ex. A, ECF 1-1. Raymond was hired on an at-will basis. See Arbitration Agreement at 4, Griffin Decl. Ex. A, ECF No. 7-1. In October 2016, CompuCom adopted a new arbitration 27 policy. Mot. at 2-3, ECF No. 7. It then sent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.