Aln

(PC) Larson v. Aln

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20221:22-cv-00811California665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HARVEY EUGENE LARSON, No. 1:22-cv-00811-DAD-BAK (GSA) (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

V. ALN, et al., MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 2, 7) 16 Plaintiff Harvey Eugene Larson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis on July 1, 2022. (Doc. Nos. 1, 2). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 6, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) be denied because: (1) he is subject to the three strikes bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and (2) the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint do not satisfy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.