Farhat
(PC) Hearne v. Farhat
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN HEARNE, No. 2:20-cv-0557 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ALEX FARHAT, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims he was purposely transferred to a prison where he had documented enemies where he was attacked and injured. For the reasons set forth below, the court will direct defendants to re-serve their motion for summary judgment on plaintiff. On July 22, 2022, defendants filed a declaration in lieu of a reply because plaintiff has not filed an opposition to their motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 82.) Therein, defendants state that under the Local Rules the time for filing an opposition expired on July 20, 2022. Defendants request that their motion for summary judgment should be deemed submitted based on plaintiff’s failure to file an opposition. It appears that plaintiff has been transferred and…