Marsh

Marsh v. Bank of Sierra, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20221:22-cv-00508California3,217 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRANCE MARSH, Case No. 1:22-cv-00508-JLT-BAK (SKO) Plaintiff, SECOND SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FINDING PLAINTIFF’S FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT FAILS TO STATE

BANK OF SIERRA, INC., et al., A COGNIZABLE FEDERAL CLAIM AND

GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND ADA

Defendants. CLAIM (Doc. 9) THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO

FILE ELECTRONICALLY (Doc. 10) 21 22 Plaintiff Terrance Marsh is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on April 29, 2022. (Doc. 1). On May 13, 2022, the undersigned screened the complaint and found that it stated one cognizable claim. (See Doc. 8.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to to file an amended complaint curing the pleading…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.