Marsh
Marsh v. Bank of Sierra, Inc.
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20221:22-cv-00508California3,217 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRANCE MARSH, Case No. 1:22-cv-00508-JLT-BAK (SKO) Plaintiff, SECOND SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FINDING PLAINTIFF’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT FAILS TO STATE
BANK OF SIERRA, INC., et al., A COGNIZABLE FEDERAL CLAIM AND
GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND ADA
Defendants. CLAIM (Doc. 9) THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO
FILE ELECTRONICALLY (Doc. 10) 21 22 Plaintiff Terrance Marsh is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on April 29, 2022. (Doc. 1). On May 13, 2022, the undersigned screened the complaint and found that it stated one cognizable claim. (See Doc. 8.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to to file an amended complaint curing the pleading…