(HC) Littleton v. Sacramento County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20222:22-cv-01159California364 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MICHAEL LITTLETON, No. 2:22-cv-1159-EFB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY, Respondent. 14 Petitioner is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel. He commenced this action using a state court form for a petition for writ of habeas corpus. ECF No. 1. Since then, he has filed various declarations, “new information,” supplements, and a motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF Nos. 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10. Petitioner, however, has neither filed an in forma pauperis application nor paid the required filing fee for a habeas action ($5.00) or a civil action ($402.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit an in forma pauperis application or the appropriate filing fee. ///// ///// 1 It is unclear whether petitioner intends to proceed with this case as a habeas action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or as a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.