Hicks
(PC) Ardds v. Hicks
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01324-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER CONSTRUING PLAINTIFF’S
DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF HIS
v. PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT AS A
MOTION TO FILE AN AMENDED
HICKS, et al., COMPLAINT (ECF No. 93) Defendants.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No. 93) 17 Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendants Hicks, Amaya, Alcantar, McIntyre, Baylon, and Sanchez (“Defendants”) for failure to protect Plaintiff from an alleged assault by Inmate Hall on November 9, 2017, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On July 18, 2022, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that: (1) Plaintiff failed to exhaust…