Lewis
(PC) Hunt v. Lewis
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TYRONE HUNT, No. 2:18-cv-2130 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER C.J. LEWIS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel, which defendant opposes. ECF Nos. 62, 63. Plaintiff moves to compel further responses to all twenty-four of his requests for production. ECF No. 62. However, he fails to specify how each response or objection is deficient as to each request and instead makes general assertions that each type of objection is deficient. Id. at 3-7. The Court does not hold prisoners proceeding pro se to the same standards that it holds attorneys. However, at a minimum, as the moving party plaintiff bears the burden of informing the court of which discovery requests are the subject of his motion to compel and,