Walter W. Wells v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20221:20-cv-00770California3,910 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BALJIT ATHWAL, et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS

TO COMPEL COUNTY DEFENDANT TO

v. PRODUCE DAVID HARRIS AND

MARLISSA FERREIRA FOR DEPOSITION,

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Doc. 201) Defendants. ORDER ISSUING LIMITED PROTECTIVE

ORDER AS TO DEPOSITIONS OF DAVID

___________________________________ HARRIS AND MARLISSA FERREIRA WALTER W. WELLS, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00770-TLN-BAM Plaintiffs, (Doc. 86) v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., Defendants. 22 Currently before the Court is a discovery dispute brought by Plaintiffs Baljit Athwal and Daljit Atwal and Plaintiffs Walter Wells and Scott McFarlane (together the “Moving Plaintiffs”) to compel Defendant County of Stanislaus (“Defendant”) to produce non-parties David Harris and Marlissa Ferreira for deposition. The individual actions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.