Epperson

Epperson v. Chemical Weapons Convention

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20221:22-cv-00734California1,244 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHRIS JONATHAN EPPERSON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00734-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION,

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

Defendant. TWENTY-ONE DAYS (ECF No. 1) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

17 Plaintiff Chris Jonathan Epperson (“Plaintiff”) proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. (ECF No. 1). The complaint, filed on June 16, 2022, lists defendants as Chemical Weapons Convention, Oracle, SAP, Hewert [sic] Packard, Global America, and Vladir [sic] Putin. Plaintiff claims to be suing under a Codification Order, Article III Constitution, and 21 Executive Order 10958. 22 The Court concludes that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims and 23 recommends dismissing it without leave to amend.

I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.