(SS) (PS) Farinelli v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON D. FARINELLI, No. 2:20-cv-001207 KJM CKD (SS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c). On June 16, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not timely filed objections, nor has he kept the court apprised of his current address; as a result, attempted service of the June 16, 2022 findings and recommendations was ineffective. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by…