Maez

Maez v. Maez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20221:22-cv-00901California4,638 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LILLIAN MARIE MAEZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00901-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATIONS TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. (Doc. 3) TOMMY J. MAEZ, II, et al.,

SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

Defendants. PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND (Doc. 1) 17 Plaintiff Lillian Marie Maez (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action against Tommy J. Maez, II, Judge Ryan I. Wells, and Deseree M. Coronado on July 20, 2022. (Doc. 1.) I. Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Plaintiff failed to pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, on July 22, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or submit an application within thirty (30) days of service of the order. (Doc. 2.) On July 27, 2022, Plaintiff submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.