(PC) Keeton v. Lynch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Tommy Roy Keeton, No. 2:20-cv-2270-KJM-EFB Plaintiff, ORDER v. Jeff Lynch, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Tommy Roy Keeton moves for reconsideration of this court’s order adopting the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations. See Mot. Recons., ECF No. 24. Specifically, 20 the court denied Mr. Keeton’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered him to pay the $402 filing fee within fourteen days from the date of the order, cautioning him that failure to 22 do so will result in the dismissal of this action. See Order, ECF No. 23. “Under Rule 59(e), a 23 motion for reconsideration should not be granted, absent highly unusual circumstances, unless the 24 district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there 1s an 25 intervening change in the controlling law.” 389 Orange St. Partners v. Arnold, 179 F.3d 656, 665 (9th Cir. 1999)…