Sacramento Homeless Union v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO HOMELESS UNION, a No. 2:22-cv-01095-TLN-KJN local of the CALIFORNIA HOMELESS UNION/STATEWIDE ORGANIZING COUNCIL, on behalf of itself and those it represents; BETTY RIOS; DONTA ORDER WILLIAMS; FALISHA SCOTT and all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a political subdivision of the State of California; CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a municipal corporation; and DOES 1–100, 19 Defendants. 20 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Sacramento Homeless Union (the “Union”), Betty Rios (“Rios”), Donta Williams, and Falisha Scott’s (“Scott”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (ECF No. 2.) Defendants County of Sacramento (the “County”) and City of Sacramento (the “City”) (collectively, “Defendants”) have filed oppositions. (ECF Nos. 6, 19.) Plaintiffs have filed replies. (ECF Nos. 11, 20.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. /// /// I. …