Eslick

(PC) Nuno v. Eslick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 1, 20221:21-cv-00769California612 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GUILLERMO NUNO, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00769-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) 10 v. ) )

O TOR D ME OR D G IFR YA N THTI EN DG I SD CE OF VEN ERD YA N AT NS D’ MOTION

SCHEDULING ORDER

ESLICK, et al., ) ) ) (ECF No. 46) Defendants. ) )

Plaintiff Guillermo Nuno is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order, filed June 21, 2022. Plaintiff filed an opposition on July 14, 2022, and Defendants did not file a reply. Local Rule 230(l). Under Fed. R. Civ. P 16(b)(4), “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge's consent.” “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 (9th Cir. 2010). The good…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.