Brown

Brown v. Zymey Industries

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20221:22-cv-00712California2,482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 JEREMY JAMES BROWN, Case No. 1:22-cv-00712-AWI-SKO Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: ZYMEY INDUSTRIES, et al., (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; Defendants. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE

WISHES TO STAND ON HIS

COMPLAINT; OR (3) FILE A NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY

DIMISSAL

20 (Doc. 1)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE 24 25 Plaintiff Jeremy James Brown is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. 26 Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 14, 2022. (Doc. 1). Upon review, the Court concludes that 27 the complaint is deficient. 28 Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a statement with the Court stating that he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.