Khoo

(PC) Gray v. Khoo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20221:20-cv-01047California1,229 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA GRAY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01047-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. ) FOR RECONSIDERATION, GRANTING

MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY

A. KHOO, et al., ) DEFENDANT, AND DENYING MOTION TO ) STAY AS MOOT Defendants. ) ) (Doc. Nos. 72, 73, 111, 112.) ) ) )

Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 108.) I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On March 16, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to substitute Dr. Flagg for defendant Mitchell in his/her official capacity and objections to the court’s March 4, 2022. (ECF Nos. 72, 73.) On July 26, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to stay reconsideration of the Court’s March 4,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.