Unknown

(PC) McNutt v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20222:22-cv-00121California303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN KEITH MCNUTT, No. 2:22-cv-0121 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER and FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

WARDEN, CSP-FOLSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed March 22, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On April 22, 2022, plaintiff was granted an additional ninety days in which to file an amended complaint. Ninety days from that date have now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall assign a district judge to this action. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.