Guibord

(PC) Turner v. Guibord

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20222:19-cv-00416California695 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANTHONY DEWAYNE LEE TURNER, No. 2:19-cv-0416 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO CITY FIRE DEPT., et al., 14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint filed on October 14, 2020. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff has filed a document purporting to be a further amended complaint. (ECF No. 70.) Plaintiff’s motion requesting discovery is also before the court. (ECF No. 71.) Defendant has filed a motion to strike plaintiff’s further amended complaint. (ECF No. 72.) Amended Complaint (ECF No. 70) On July 11, 2022, plaintiff filed a document styled as an amended complaint. (ECF No. 70.) Under Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within (A) 21 days after serving it, or (B) 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.