Thompson

(HC) Villalobos v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20222:22-cv-00168California464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL VILLALOBOS, No. 2:22-cv-0168 KJM DB P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PAUL THOMPSON, Warden, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. By order dated May 19, 2022, petitioner was directed to file an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within thirty days. (ECF No. 5.) Petitioner was advised that failure to comply with the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) Those thirty days have passed, and petitioner has not submitted an affidavit, paid the filing fee, requested additional time to do so, or otherwise responded to the order. The undersigned notes that it appears petitioner has been transferred1 to a different prison facility. While petitioner has not

1 The Federal Bureau of Prisons inmate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.