Yaplee

(PC) Washington v. Yaplee

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20221:20-cv-01356California556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 ROBERT WASHINGTON, Case No. 1:20-cv-01356-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PRO BONO v. COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 STEVEN M. YAPLEE, (ECF No. 47)

Defendant.

17 Robert Washington (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 1, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No. 47). Plaintiff asks for appointment of counsel because he is unable to afford counsel; because the issues involved in this case are complex; because Plaintiff is “under” the Americans with Disabilities Act; because the paralegal that Plaintiff asked to help him backed out after agreeing to help; because Plaintiff has no knowledge of the law or federal court rules; because this case involves medical issues that may require expert testimony; because Plaintiff has demanded a jury trial; because this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.