Hill

(PC) Davis v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20222:22-cv-00407California815 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 LLOYD CLIFTON DAVIS, Case No. 2:22-cv-00407-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: v. (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT

SUBJECT TO A RECOMMENDATION

RICK HILL, et al., THAT IT BE DISMISSED; OR Defendants. (2) FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT ECF No. 10 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, alleges that defendants violated his First Amendment rights by interfering with his legal mail and frustrating his access to the courts. Plaintiff’s complaint does not state a cognizable claim against any defendant. Screening Order I. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.