Schaupp

Schaupp v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20221:22-cv-00849California2,997 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAROLYN SCHAUPP, Case No. 1:22-cv-00849-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND REQUIRING

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE;

AND RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF IFP

Defendants. APPLICATIONS BROUGHT ON BEHALF

OF MINORS L.S., D.S., P.I., AND J.B.

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

(ECF No. 9)

FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE 19 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Carolyn Schaupp (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in this action on behalf of herself and minors L.S., D.S., P.I., and J.B. on July 11, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has not filed any petition to appear guardian ad litem on behalf of minors L.S., D.S., P.I., and J.B. Plaintiff also did not pay the filing fee and instead…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.