Schaupp
Schaupp v. County of Stanislaus
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20221:22-cv-00849California2,997 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CAROLYN SCHAUPP, Case No. 1:22-cv-00849-JLT-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DENYING
v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND REQUIRING
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE;
AND RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF IFP
Defendants. APPLICATIONS BROUGHT ON BEHALF
OF MINORS L.S., D.S., P.I., AND J.B.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
(ECF No. 9)
FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE 19 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Carolyn Schaupp (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in this action on behalf of herself and minors L.S., D.S., P.I., and J.B. on July 11, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has not filed any petition to appear guardian ad litem on behalf of minors L.S., D.S., P.I., and J.B. Plaintiff also did not pay the filing fee and instead…