(SS) Heilman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 1, 20222:21-cv-00476California8,618 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANNETTE KELLY HEILMAN, No. 2:21-CV-0476-DMC Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff,1 who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Pursuant to the written consent of all parties, ECF Nos. 7 and 12, this case is before the undersigned as the presiding judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); see also ECF No. 19 (minute order reassigning case to Magistrate Judge). Pending before the Court are the parties’ briefs on the merits, ECF Nos. 16 and 17. / / / / / / / / / 27 Plaintiff’s last name is spelled “Heilman” in her complaint and on the docket, and “Heilmann” elsewhere in the record. The Court reviews the Commissioner’s final decision to determine whether it is: (1) based on proper legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.