Norris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAMAR JORDAN, No. 1:20-cv-0467 JLT EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

E. ANUNCIACION, et al., (Docs. 52, 63) Defendants. 16 The plaintiff asserts he suffered violations of his Eighth Amendment rights while incarcerated. He contends Napoles and Anunciacion, both of whom are dentists, were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs related to post-operative dental care. (See Doc. 1.) Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 52.) The assigned magistrate judge found there were “genuine disputes of material fact regarding whether Defendants knowingly disregarded Plaintiff’s serious medical needs.” (Doc. 63 at 2, 19.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the motion for summary judgment be denied. (Id.) The Court granted the parties 21 days to file any objections to the Findings and 26 …