Stone v. Accelerated Engineering Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20222:20-cv-00554California432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Timothy Stone, Case No. 2:20-cv-00554-KJM-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. Accelerated Engineering Services, Inc., et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Timothy Stone moves to enforce a settlement agreement against defendants Accelerated Engineering Services, Inc., Sierra Elizabeth Schneider, and Daniel Cotrone. Mot., ECF No. 21. Defendants have not responded to the motion. As explained below, the court 20 denies the motion for lack of subject matter Jurisdiction. Mr. Stone filed the notice of the parties’ settlement on January 11, 2022. ECF No. 18. The then-presiding judge ordered the parties to file dispositional documents closing this case no 23 later than February 28, 2022. ECF No. 19. On February 28, 2022, Mr. Stone filed a status report 24 stating that defendants have not performed their settlement obligations and that he does not intend 25 to dismiss this action until…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.